Galadrin
Member
mbh":1y7qgzli said:That sounds about right but is it even worth labeling any of this?
I don't think we are talking about making explicit forum rules that all posts need to measure up to—that would of course be impractical and not desirable in any case. I think we are just exploring a theory of community, something to bring our conversations in focus so that they can build and be productive. The early promise of those first few Blogs that started bouncing the idea of Oldhammer off each other and creating synergy was just that—how do we make a passing hobby and interest into something bigger, in the same way as the Old School Renaissance of roleplaying has taken off and become more than the sum of its parts.
To do that, it is helpful to start to think about what our common grounds of exchange are. That doesn't mean those grounds are not up for debate and disagreement—both conversations and communities do not have to ultimately return to some fundamental thing that we all can agree on. Rather, both the inevitable agreement and disagreement are useful if we can make them productive and cool. I believe that having a common framework (rather than unifying dogma) will help us with that.
Padre":1y7qgzli said:But none of this is in a spirit of complaint. I enjoy seeing what you collectors get up to, and learning a bit about the figures. Best of all is when I see something and think "That's be great for my campaign."
Nice, that is exactly what I mean! Someone could contribute something to the forum discussions that is not exactly "your thing" but it totally inspires you to own it and change your game (whether your campaign, your collection, your painting style, your house rules or that Oldhammer novel you've had kicking around your thoughts for the last year). Then bring it back, share and start the whole cycle over again.