Goblinlee
Member
Asslessman":eezsugkj said:Slow claps Lee, 100% behind you !
I did wonder why it started off with an old link, but I was reading this morning about new Warhammer backgrounds, so it made sense.
The Space Slann are varnished
Asslessman":eezsugkj said:Slow claps Lee, 100% behind you !
According to rumours square ones will be allowed too - so we have a mix of bases?mbh":3jdvgwnk said:round bases
Well, thats a preference thing but I am sure that there is not much 100% dislike aroundskirmish focus
We survived the deminishing of the Slann race, disappearing of Pygmies, the Great Maw of the ogre race, chaos dwarf big hats and so much more...Existing setting/fluff gone
My first armies were based on chaos, evil, neutral and good - with some leewaymixing of the different factions
I can't remember playing with units of 40+ in 3rd edition (or in 4th or 5th)lower model count
Well, the leopard (sadly) won't change its spotssame awful prices
Niibl":3hxtvufn said:I think that oldhammerers who played third edition (or 1st, or 2nd) and liked the Realms of Chaos books, will have less issues with these changes than other warhammer players.
According to rumours square ones will be allowed too - so we have a mix of bases?mbh":3hxtvufn said:round bases
I'm pretty sure that a lot of us even have hex-bases and still won't hesitate to use the models.
Well, thats a preference thing but I am sure that there is not much 100% dislike aroundskirmish focus
We survived the deminishing of the Slann race, disappearing of Pygmies, the Great Maw of the ogre race, chaos dwarf big hats and so much more...Existing setting/fluff gone
And it is rumoured that we get a reality bubble - parallel dimension thing - multiverse floting in the warp (or something like that)
I think I'll get over it (The Über-knights rumours have me worried though)
My first armies were based on chaos, evil, neutral and good - with some leewaymixing of the different factions
I can't remember playing with units of 40+ in 3rd edition (or in 4th or 5th)lower model count
Well, the leopard (sadly) won't change its spotssame awful prices
But me and many others have resources (either financially, cunning trade skills or tons of painting bag log anyway)
I still hope that GW succeeds with these changes. As stated above already : If they go down, the whole hobby goes down.
Niibl":keponoi7 said:I am pretty sure that the game will be as much a skirmish game as 40k nowerdays. GW can not earn much with a handfull of miniatures per player. They will just reset for beginners and, if the scaling is not openly implemented, it will most likely be possible. Give it one year (or spplement) or two and mass battles are back.
Gesendet von meinem SM-T335 mit Tapatalk
Niibl":ymtoomco said:I am pretty sure that the game will be as much a skirmish game as 40k nowerdays. GW can not earn much with a handfull of miniatures per player. They will just reset for beginners and, if the scaling is not openly implemented, it will most likely be possible. Give it one year (or spplement) or two and mass battles are back.
Gesendet von meinem SM-T335 mit Tapatalk
mbh":1qrzkq1i said:Defiitely don't want to see GW go away but this is a company that's proud of not doing market research or listening to their customers.
Padre":d3f3hoif said:I'm self-employed and have to admit I am not 100% convinced that you're comment, diesel monkey, hits the nail on the head. I think I might just continue to listen to my customers.
dieselmonkey":3dxvshhi said:Padre":3dxvshhi said:I'm self-employed and have to admit I am not 100% convinced that you're comment, diesel monkey, hits the nail on the head. I think I might just continue to listen to my customers.
Even the vast majority that demand you sell your stuff at a loss, because they still think it's the late 80's?
Or is that just wargamers?
Zhu Bajie":302gyt7i said:which is why we're Fortnam and Masons, not Lidl, and can sell pork pies for £30 not 25p.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.