AranaszarSzuur
Vassal
But it feels to me more like crowding out and erasing the original and losing the Oldhammer feel.twisted moon":299kmnm4 said:i agree there does seem to be some tendency to embrace the earlier history of wh40k.
But it feels to me more like crowding out and erasing the original and losing the Oldhammer feel.twisted moon":299kmnm4 said:i agree there does seem to be some tendency to embrace the earlier history of wh40k.
Old Necromunda got pretty much buried. Now Horus Heresy beakies, Leagues of Votann, etc. are starting to crowd out real Rogue Trader stuff.Fimm McCool":wmp0dsa9 said:We've seen with new versions of Necromunda, the Rogue Trader game, nods to squats and classic artwork in recent minis etc. that there is a love for the 'Oldhammer' alive and well in GW, it's just that it's aimed at the modern kids not us. Does that bother me? Well, not really, except in two ways-
a)It means in influx of not-what-I-would-Call-Oldhammer into Oldhammer circles which then lose their identity/character and become conventional "I painted (or bought) a GW thing" platforms.
b)It makes it harder to find the 'real' old stuff online if there's a bunch of new stuff with the same name.
I think the main problem is that the modern GW stuff doesn't match. The style of miniatures if very different. It's all about crowding out and keeping things modern.symphonicpoet":wmp0dsa9 said:in day to day life I figure live and let live is the best. And nobody's new models will hurt my old ones. And as for me, I need new models from time to time to keep that old modeling flame alive. I just want them to mostly match what I've already got.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.