NSFW Blanche and the Femme Corporis Politique

A "Not Safe For Work" prefix for content that might be a bit more risque.

Zhu Bajie

Baron
Several mentions of John Blanche artwork in response to the new Space Crusade. I'm a massive fan of Johns work, and some of the comments (about john not approving or doing nudes) didn't quite ring true. There's a few Ideas I have kicking around about applying theory (queer/gender/art) to the work, and would be really interested in getting some other perspectives and examples.

show-pic.phtml

"White Dwarf 7" 1978 via RPG.net

show-pic.phtml

"White Dwarf 11" 1978 via RPG.net

John_Blanche_-_The_Sentinel.jpg

"The Sentinel" via wikipedia. Perhaps from Ratspike? It seems to have had sci-fi elements added, and had the facemask significantly altered.

tumblr_ljmgkiP2tx1qhslato1_1280.jpg

Detail from Starseer via Goblinfunk (great name for a blog that).

tumblr_lhl8vihiX91qhslato1_r1_500.jpg
Femme Militant (Ratspyke? anyone know the provenance of this image?) via Goblinfunk

tumblr_maf5j1DutI1qhslato1_540.jpg


tumblr_madmjqrmdu1qhslato1_1280.jpg


tumblr_madm3vFinN1qhslato1_1280.jpg


all via http://gothicpunk.tumblr.com/ but then you knew that already.

There are of course doubt many, many others, but the first two - the White Dwarf covers immediately came to mind, as well as "The Red Hawker" from "In Search of Forever" by paper Tiger, which I cannot find online.

...I was utterly sick of seeing brilliant artists producing painting after painting of near-naked fantasy females with chests the size of airships. Elements of this style of fantasy art were creeping onto the front of White Dwarf. I was receiving letters on a weekly basis, complaining about what people saw as exploitation of the female form.

wikipedia (edited a little)":18ca6n3z said:
Heroin chic was a look ... characterized by pale skin, dark circles underneath the eyes and angular bone structure. The look, characterised by emaciated features and androgyny... An article in the Los Angeles Times stated that the fashion industry had "a nihilistic vision of beauty"...

A culture fixated on female thinness is not an obsession about female beauty, but an obsession about female obedience. Dieting is the most potent political sedative in women’s history; a quietly mad population is a tractable one.
 
I am not sure I understand your question (if there is one). I'm not sure I understand the thread's title, to be honest. What exactly do you have in mind?

I quite like blanche's artwork. I don't find it "exploitative" personally, but art is art. If it ain't free to be what it is, then it ain't art.
 
I always read that quote from Blanche as more relating to the large breasts aspect, not the scantily clad women aspect.
 
John Blanche is interesting in this context because he does half naked women that are rather disturbing. No massive boobs and bums in sexy poses here. Nothing that would testosterone loaded adolescents say 'Whoaahaa". medium to small breasts and a skin disease instead, but no chainmail bikini or 1980's airbrushed b-movie poster.

Some of the old Warzone artwork was very boring. I think it was Paolo Parente who did some of those faux-Bisley illustrations with big tits, much like these new Space Crusade miniatures. Annoying and irritating surely. Certainly from a feminist point of view.

I also did some paintings with gloomy half naked girls and I even did a small expo with them, but no-one ever said they were sexist or exploiting the female form. And it's not that the public of the place was lacking basic feminist theory.
 
Out of curiosity, what's with this "feminist theory" stuff? I see it pop up in the most peculiar places, as if its some panacea for human existence. Certainly there are times and places where something is appropriate, but why am I running into it everywhere? It's all a bit much, no?
 
Galadrin":35lds258 said:
Out of curiosity, what's with this "feminist theory" stuff? I see it pop up in the most peculiar places, as if its some panacea for human existence. Certainly there are times and places where something is appropriate, but why am I running into it everywhere? It's all a bit much, no?
I don't think it is a bit much. Learning to recognize innate biases is required to correct those innate biases.

I've got a longer reply in mind for Zhu's original post, bit it's a bit much to do on my phone and I'm rarely at a computer at home (my office blocks the forum).
 
I'm still not sure I see the endgame here. Why are we correcting "innate biases," and what is the worldview that we are correcting them towards? Biases are not "right" or "wrong" in the same way that ethical or moral claims are "right" or "wrong," unless you have some ideal, moral world imagined (Biblical, Quranic, whatever). And they certainly are not right or wrong like maths equations are... If you mean "correcting" as an "ought" claim, then I would hardly think we all share a moral vision (even if we all agree image X is objectionable). It seems more likely that "correcting" is a claim about what "is," and if that is indeed the case, I think we are all in a spot of trouble if we are requiring our fantasy artwork to comply to what "is." I still feel my point is valid here: if art is going to be art, it has to be free to do so.
 
I think your last point is very valid.
I don't know abot the other places where you have read it but with basic feminist theory I intend awareness of certain dynamics in our culture towards the female body and the role and position of women compared to men in society. Many of these dynamics aren't that apparent at all and are very often ignored or denied by both men and women. Loads of books and articles and studies have been written about this, which is the theoretical part: feminist theory.
It has nothing to do with being morally right or wrong or with any particular ideology.
 
Blanchitsu is exempted from critique by the virtue of being seriously bizzarre shit, just like Giger :grin: .

Zhu Bajie":2at908oq said:
A culture fixated on female thinness is not an obsession about female beauty, but an obsession about female obedience. Dieting is the most potent political sedative in women’s history; a quietly mad population is a tractable one.
Culture driven mostly by women and homosexual men.
From my experience, male expectations of women as potential partners are much more health oriented.

Galadrin":2at908oq said:
I'm still not sure I see the endgame here. Why are we correcting "innate biases," and what is the worldview that we are correcting them towards? Biases are not "right" or "wrong" in the same way that ethical or moral claims are "right" or "wrong," unless you have some ideal, moral world imagined (Biblical, Quranic, whatever). And they certainly are not right or wrong like maths equations are... If you mean "correcting" as an "ought" claim, then I would hardly think we all share a moral vision (even if we all agree image X is objectionable). It seems more likely that "correcting" is a claim about what "is," and if that is indeed the case, I think we are all in a spot of trouble if we are requiring our fantasy artwork to comply to what "is." I still feel my point is valid here: if art is going to be art, it has to be free to do so.
All is fun and games until your daughter ends up anorectic because some popular jeans designer forgot that women tend to have wider hips than boys (actually happened on mass scale in 90s).
 
Interesting stuff. Really like to read your longer response to the original post Ardyer! Galadrin, yes art is art, and we're free to discus it. I don't think I'm interested in moral absolutes, and certainly have no intention condemning art, rather reading it in context. Area23 I'd love to see your nudes. PM me if you'd be so kind (if not, no worries!) - there is perhaps something there about the atmosphere of gloom and the psychology of skinny. AranaszarSzuur - good observations, the media-image / mental-health issue is a huge one.

Meanwhile some further ruminations...

I was utterly sick of seeing brilliant artists producing painting after painting of near-naked fantasy females with chests the size of airships… I was receiving letters on a weekly basis, complaining about what people saw as exploitation of the female form.

The juxtaposition of 'sick' and 'chest' in Blanches statement seems to invite a reading in terms of Freudian symbolism around the Oral stage of psychosexual development. The small, often monstrous, alien breast that appears in Blanches work time and time again suggesting a form of under-nourishment, leads to sadism. Or perhaps it just signifies infantile lactose intolerance.

What Blanche seems to by saying by his criticism, says is that this female form:
4e46daa671a6f06def44c458c9483bda.jpg

Kate Moss - the

but not this female form:
2d17fe762b256389efb97ba40af3d8c2.jpg

Chistina Hendricks

are suitable for fantasy art.

Another model for dissecting the female form is that of "The Triple Goddess", an idea found in Goddess Feminism, the neopagan religion of Wicca and certain fictional and critical responses to that. This is an abstracted, symbolic, model of feminine spiritual identity, loosely based on ancient greek mythology and dreamed up by a man (Robert Graves, in his The White Goddess) and so naturally problematic, as all theoretical models are, because of its fundamental reductionism, however it can have some use as a way of thinking about female identity and critical uses as an abstract model.

The 3 forms, the Maiden, the Mother and the Crone.

The Maiden is a young woman, adolescent, headstrong.
The Mother is an adult woman, fertility, nurturing.
The Crone is an aged woman, wisdom and old age, and renewal.

maiden-mother-crone.jpg

Maiden, Mother & Crone, by Maxine Miller

My criticism of the Triple Goddess to the depictions of the female forms concept goes something like this: Kate Moss, my poster-woman for the Maiden a skinny, high breasted woman, and has remained so through her life, and is, physically, a mother. Christina Hendricks my poster-woman of the Mother, with a curvaceous form that echoes that of a neolithic fertility goddess, says she wants no children, and so shall remain a maiden. The equation of moral, intellectual, spiritual and psychological values with 'stages' of a womans life or physical shape is absurd.

So why am I using a critical model that I think is absurd? Well, for a start life is absurd, and because it is just a model, a baseline from which we can discuss difference and deviation from that model. The models use is not that in itself it is a great 'truth' (as far as I can see, it isn't), but in the light it sheds on other things and the network of texts it can enmesh a subject in. In this case the Triple Goddess immediately and clearly highlights what is absent.

Blanche returns time and again to the image of a thin, small and high breasted female figure - The Maiden. The wide 'child bearing' hips or enlarged 'milk producing' breasts that are biologically associated with a mature, fertile female figure is entirely absent from Blanches depictions. The Venus of Willendorf has no place in his field of reference. We can admit, also, that the figure of the crone seems in absentia, but then she generally is in western culture, except when demonised as an old hag.

We could, at a stretch consider many of Blanches figures as containing both the Maiden and the Crone, as they take on much of the 'monstrous' visual nature of the aged - liver-spots, but the crone herself, the wise-woman associated with death and renewal is absent. But the pretty-young thing welded to death-concepts, threads her own archetypal thread through culture be it Neil Gaiman's Death, or H R Gigers Li or the Norse goddess Hel.

So putting aside possible oral-fixative or lactose intolerant fears of larger breasts. What is it that would make Kate Moss suitable, and not Christina Hendricks appropriate models for females in fantasy art?

One answer may be the Maiden as Huntress - she is free of child-rearing, maternal duties unlike the Mother, although we can think of pairings such as Ogami and Diagoro, Big Daddy and Hit Girl, or even Batman and Robin - paternal figures taking the children under their care into danger, the arena of death and the way of the warrior - it is rare for a mother to take on such an adventuring role. Boudica, for example, is a spirit of vengeance, whose power stems not from themselves, but in righting the wrongs perpetrated upon them, they seem not 'heroic', but ultimately tragic. The idea of a heroic mother striding forth with her warrior-children seems almost unthinkable by society.


0om32xjl12z4.jpg

The Tyrant Cindy Crawford

GuinevereVanSeenus_JilSander_CraigMcDean.jpg

Guinevere van Seenus of the Avant Garde

Another reason could be the revolutionary punk (grunge) attitude of Heroin Chic, the rejection of the image of over-clean, over-healthy, ideal as being the dominant image of beauty. German fashion designer Jil Sander, when questioned about 'Heroin Chic' (the tabloid mutant offspring superskinny and drug culture, not an actual thing) said in 96 'There is a generational change. We want to dress women in a way so they feel modern. I don't want them to look retro or 80's luxe -- I'm totally against it. It's too easy."


It may be that Blanche had a similar feeling, that the 80s airbrushed glamour, along with the the 70s airbrushed fantasy (epitomised by the likes of Boris Vallejo, and perhaps, as Blanche mentions White Dwarf covers, Christos Achilleos, had simply become too tyrannical. The images too oppressive, too normalised, too dull and banal, and that alternate forms of femininity - and especially 'fantasy-heroic' femininity presented a way forward. After all, bodies come in al shapes and sizes, why not mirror this diversity in art? If the healthy-breeding-stock of the glamourised Mother Goddess is out, the Crone is never an acceptable option, perhaps the Maiden with her slim hips and potential energy provided that alternative.

The 'problem' comes that all images in their time become the tools of tyranny. The mainstreaming of the waif in the 90's produced a generation blighted by eating disorders, the supermodels of the 80's drove people en-mass into therapy, surgery and the insanity of legwarmers. It is the idea that beauty itself has value - its endless repetition, cultural stagnation and oppression of human diversity that comes with it. The beauty-ideals themselves are destroyed and renewed like the cycle of the seasons, from the budding Goddess of Spring to the voluptuous Goddess of Summer, to the harridan Goddess of Winter and round again upon the next cycle, each new seasons unattainable ideal as tyrannical as the last.

Marilyndiptych.jpg

Marilyn Diptych, Warhol.
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell 1984

Oral-fixation, lactose intolerance, androgeny, Neopagan archetypes, german minimalist fashion designers, Warhol as Orwellian nightmare, drug addicts, no wonder Wolf off of Gladiators looks confused.
B7vd2s7IIAAA49F.jpg:large

(Barbarian, videogame 1987, Maria Whittaker and Wolf, off of Gladiators)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Almost no need for me to post now. Your heroin chic hypothesis covered most of it. The rest dealt with a misunderstanding (and/or possible perversion of) 60s era feminism that occurred in the 70s especially in art circles...of which John Blanche would have cut his teeth in.

My understanding (since I didn't experience it myself) is that many 70s men misunderstood (whether purposefully or accidentally) the 60s sexual liberation that women can have sex whenever they want as women should have sex all the time. This mixed message lead (again, my understanding) to man liberal, artist type men to reject obvious depictions is sexual domination, but embrace the less obvious in a (hopefully) mistaken belief that it wasn't oppressive because it was not the traditional form.

Hopefully the above makes sense, I risked worrying it on my phone due to the shortened hypothesis ;)
 
Zhu Bajie":3e3opa82 said:
So putting aside possible oral-fixative or lactose intolerant fears of larger breasts.
The funny thing is that there were studies done and it turned out there's no correlation between breast size and milk production. I suspect that most of differences in breast size come from fat and connective tissue.

Zhu Bajie":3e3opa82 said:
What is it that would make Kate Moss suitable, and not Christina Hendricks appropriate models for females in fantasy art?
In Jungian/MBTI terms, fantasy tends to be made by and attract people who are inherently spiritual. Intuitive types and more - especially types that tend to have intuitions as the dominant function. I know a group that does visual identification of types and a lot of fantasy writers are ENFPs or INFJs (which by the way, form an inspiration pair).

Christina Hendricks is an ESFP, while Kate Moss is an ENFP. Different species of a person. Extroverted sensing and extroverted intuition can be easily seen in the eyes. Christina Hendricks has dead, soulless eyes of a materialist. Not a good inspiration for a fantasy artist.

Not that I haven't looked at her pictures before. It's just I didn't know about the difference in eyes.

Zhu Bajie":3e3opa82 said:
The 'problem' comes that all images in their time become the tools of tyranny. The mainstreaming of the waif in the 90's produced a generation blighted by eating disorders, the supermodels of the 80's drove people en-mass into therapy, surgery and the insanity of legwarmers. It is the idea that beauty itself has value - its endless repetition, cultural stagnation and oppression of human diversity that comes with it. The beauty-ideals themselves are destroyed and renewed like the cycle of the seasons, from the budding Goddess of Spring to the voluptuous Goddess of Summer, to the harridan Goddess of Winter and round again upon the next cycle, each new seasons unattainable ideal as tyrannical as the last.
Fashion is a hate crime.

Zhu Bajie":3e3opa82 said:
One answer may be the Maiden as Huntress - she is free of child-rearing, maternal duties unlike the Mother, although we can think of pairings such as Ogami and Diagoro, Big Daddy and Hit Girl, or even Batman and Robin - paternal figures taking the children under their care into danger, the arena of death and the way of the warrior - it is rare for a mother to take on such an adventuring role. Boudica, for example, is a spirit of vengeance, whose power stems not from themselves, but in righting the wrongs perpetrated upon them, they seem not 'heroic', but ultimately tragic. The idea of a heroic mother striding forth with her warrior-children seems almost unthinkable by society.


0om32xjl12z4.jpg

The Tyrant Cindy Crawford

GuinevereVanSeenus_JilSander_CraigMcDean.jpg

Guinevere van Seenus of the Avant Garde

Another reason could be the revolutionary punk (grunge) attitude of Heroin Chic, the rejection of the image of over-clean, over-healthy, ideal as being the dominant image of beauty. German fashion designer Jil Sander, when questioned about 'Heroin Chic' (the tabloid mutant offspring superskinny and drug culture, not an actual thing) said in 96 'There is a generational change. We want to dress women in a way so they feel modern. I don't want them to look retro or 80's luxe -- I'm totally against it. It's too easy."

e97152a3bc6d600b9c15396a24a0b430.jpg

Boris Vallejo

It may be that Blanche had a similar feeling, that the 80s airbrushed glamour, along with the the 70s airbrushed fantasy (epitomised by the likes of Boris Vallejo, and perhaps, as Blanche mentions White Dwarf covers, Christos Achilleos, had simply become too tyrannical. The images too oppressive, too normalised, too dull and banal, and that alternate forms of femininity - and especially 'fantasy-heroic' femininity presented a way forward. After all, bodies come in al shapes and sizes, why not mirror this diversity in art? If the healthy-breeding-stock of the glamourised Mother Goddess is out, the Crone is never an acceptable option, perhaps the Maiden with her slim hips and potential energy provided that alternative.
I suspect it's mostly the punk attitude. Blanche's art is very decadent and "messy". Punk attitude would fit it great.

Also, what about his femme militante designs?
 
AranaszarSzuur - Blanche isn't talking about the eyes, or personality types, he's talking about the size of breasts! ;) Similarly the "size matters" thing is part of the whole fertility cult. There are massive exaggerations with livestock painting in the 18th/19th century - the scientific validity isn't as relevant as the myths place in our culture.

1402574618567


Blanche also name-drops Jenny Saville in his comments on Steve Bundles blog: http://spyglassasylum.blogspot.co.uk/20 ... anvas.html

branded.jpg

Branded - Jenny Saville

and Rembrant here:

606px-Rembrandt_-_Bathsheba_at_Her_Bath_-_WGA19090.jpg

Rembrant

So certainly is aware of larger female forms in art, but more often than not chooses to depict other forms. Blanches work is often historically informed, would be interesting to hear him talk on art history.

ardyer":35k1n52u said:
Almost no need for me to post now. Your heroin chic hypothesis covered most of it. The rest dealt with a misunderstanding (and/or possible perversion of) 60s era feminism that occurred in the 70s especially in art circles...

I think the idea that the sexual liberation of the 1960s led to an oversexualised expectations of women in the 1970s has support in feminist literature.

Meanwhile, I don't know if attributing the body type (which appears in Blanches work circa 77) to a punk / rebeliion rejection of the mainstream is a bit too easy, the same motifs and forms still appear in his work over 20 years later, and superskinny has become the norm.

AranaszarSzuur":35k1n52u said:
Also, what about his femme militante designs?

Well post them up and lets have a look!
 
Galadrin":2kbq6cz8 said:
Ok, now I am sure that I’ve been had and this thread is just an excuse to post up NSFW piccies.

:)

The intent of the thread is to discuss the works of John Blanche in context of at criticism, and specifically feminist theory. To do so requires examples both pro and contra the works of the artist and his statements about his art. This is especially important as several of the people here have identified a theme of over-turning the dominant imagery of the time, which needs to be illustrated in order to make sense. If you have a problem with the adult subject matter of the thread, it was clearly marked out as such in the subject-line, and the subject for discussion laid out in the first post. You are free to ignore it if you wish.

However, I appreciate this is a difficult subject. Especially online where discussions tend towards superficial polarisation of argument and entrenched viewpoints rather than reasoned discussion. I encourage you to engage with the material, as you have expressed some interest in it. John Bergers Ways of Seeing, is a great introduction to feminist art criticism, and particularly the construction of the male gaze in painting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1GI8mNU5Sg it's only half an hour long but is full of very relevant ideas.

I am currently thinking about the way John Blanche uses shoes in his character design, particularly in the sense of S&M / punk / control / phallocenticity / fetishism and postmodern gender performance.

IMG_0016.JPG
 
While the characters are almost always warriors, sanding, posed erect, holding weapons - often long the footwear is entirely inappropriate for combat situations. The ballet boot makes the wearer essentially unstable, it takes much practice to walk in them let alone enter physical combat or hold a recoiling firearm.

So lets sssume that these shoes aren't intended as hard science-fiction military-sci-fi equipment, their function as footware is secondary to their idealised form. But what ideal?

Leganeur":1dl5vkb7 said:
One of the reasons that ballet boots are made is to inflict punishment on those who wear them.

The physical deformation accompanied by discomfort and pain. The high heel shoe, and fetish boots are read in feminism as a symbol of submission, a contortion of the body to a normative, external, set of values, be they culturally informed or personal fetishism, and subsequently submission to male control, either the individual fetishist or patriarchy as a whole.

Rossi":1dl5vkb7 said:
The body posture takes on the look of a putter pigeon, with lots of breast an tail balanced precariously on a pair of stilts

Rossi's comment on the exaggerated pose, focusing the the formation of a new, unnatural, silhouette. Blanches figures of women conform to the stripper-pose -not how static and posed they are - understanable in concept / costume art, but even in fully painted scenes - Soritas or Amazona Gothique, the figures are posing, presenting themselves for view, not doing anything. Despite their warlike accouterments, they are almost uniformly passive. Compare with the nude posed in reference to classical mythological / bibilical references, to the use of the prostitute as model. (Berger, Ways of Seeing ep. 2) Consider also the Greek Hetairai / Pornai.

Rossi":1dl5vkb7 said:
There is no practical reason why boys and girls, or men and women should wear shoes with pronounced styling differences. The only reason is sexual, an insignia to designate the separation of the sexes.

It is in the power of designation, the cultural symbolism of the high-heeled shoe, where I would locate the Blanchian Boot. We aren't looking at a woman, we are looking at pixels, representing a print, representing paint, a record of process. Blanches 'women' are not women at all, but artifically constructed images carrying forwards culturally codified, and fetishised conceptions of femininity, that we as viewers have to comply with those conventions to read them as women.The extreme high heel shoe as a cultural symbol for femininity is one of the reasons it is a mainstay of the Drag Queen and transvestite costume, an idea that leads us to notions of gender as performance (i.e. the adoption of a set of artificial, cultural, not biological signifiers), and that by over-emphasising fetishised cultural signs of femininity, Blanches figures situate themselves with ambiguity towards the gender on display: Queerhammer.

1. Quotes taken from Beauty and Misogyny: Harmful Cultural Practices in the West by Sheila Jeffreys
 

Attachments

  • blanche_shoes.jpg
    blanche_shoes.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 1,975
Don't forget that this is ART and so there is a VISUAL rationale behind these things too. The ballet-boot style elongates the legs and gives an aesthetically pleasing slope into the ground that flat footwear doesn't. This is, after all, why ballet dancers (even men) point their toes. The lines are just more elegant that way.
 
Fimm McCool":ausmh7k2 said:
Don't forget that this is ART and so there is a VISUAL rationale behind these things too. The ballet-boot style elongates the legs and gives an aesthetically pleasing slope into the ground that flat footwear doesn't. This is, after all, why ballet dancers (even men) point their toes. The lines are just more elegant that way.

Spacemarine_007ByJohnBlanche.jpg


Well, why aren't Space Marines on their tippy-toes if it's just more VISUALLY elegant that way? Consider that aesthetics in ART are not a set of absolute values that are equally distributed to all subjects.

I don't believe many people would consider this:

399px-%27David%27_by_Michelangelo_JBU0001.JPG


much improved by putting him in kinky boots, no matter how more elegant the line of the calf to the ground may be perceived. It seems entirely gendered and normative that women must primarily conform to being aesthetically pleasing, wheras men are not.
 
Zhu Bajie:mhhokjdm said:
Fimm McCool:mhhokjdm said:
Don't forget that this is ART and so there is a VISUAL rationale behind these things too. The ballet-boot style elongates the legs and gives an aesthetically pleasing slope into the ground that flat footwear doesn't. This is, after all, why ballet dancers (even men) point their toes. The lines are just more elegant that way.

Spacemarine_007ByJohnBlanche.jpg


Well, why aren't Space Marines on their tippy-toes if it's just more VISUALLY elegant that way? Consider that aesthetics in ART are not a set of absolute values that are equally distributed to all subjects.

I don't believe many people would consider this:

much improved by putting him in kinky boots, no matter how more elegant the line of the calf to the ground may be perceived. It seems entirely gendered and normative that women must primarily conform to being aesthetically pleasing, wheras men are not.
Was browsing Tumblr recently and accidentally stumbled into areas populated by fashion worshippers. Ironically, high-heeled shoes actually started out as men's shoes. Some fashion worshippers there were bemoaning men not being forced to wear foot-deforming shoes and not wearing sexualized-clothes in presence of non-consenting public.
Fashion and status worshippers are dangerous, deranged individuals.

Zhu Bajie:mhhokjdm said:
AranaszarSzuur:mhhokjdm said:
Also, what about his femme militante designs?

Well post them up and lets have a look!
http://gothicpunk.tumblr.com/tagged/Femme-Militant
 
Zhu Bajie":3abm3xrz said:
Fimm McCool":3abm3xrz said:
Don't forget that this is ART and so there is a VISUAL rationale behind these things too. The ballet-boot style elongates the legs and gives an aesthetically pleasing slope into the ground that flat footwear doesn't. This is, after all, why ballet dancers (even men) point their toes. The lines are just more elegant that way.

Spacemarine_007ByJohnBlanche.jpg


Well, why aren't Space Marines on their tippy-toes if it's just more VISUALLY elegant that way? Consider that aesthetics in ART are not a set of absolute values that are equally distributed to all subjects.

Why do you think the massively chunky guards on the lower legs? They're not an homage to the useful design of shin guards and the leg guards of, say, Greek soldiery. No, what they do is widen the bottom of the leg so that the ankles are pretty much the same width as the feet, which gives the same effect of merging into the ground. In this case, because marines aren't spindly and elegant in the way a lot of JB's characters are, they need a visually strong (wide) base where they meet the ground to give the effect of power.
 
Back
Top